|
Wings
Jun 11, 2014 16:26:14 GMT
Post by Admin on Jun 11, 2014 16:26:14 GMT
For those of you that want to put a wing on the spec sprints, maybe you should just go to Fallon Nv. Rattlesnake Raceway. A high bank 1/4 that looks like Daytona. Their rules are the same as the ones here except wings are optional. In 2007 I ran this track which then was the first sprint car race there and it was wingless spec sprints. Fun track just wish they had the wisdom to not put the wings on them. I don't know what their purse is.
Per their rules >
WINGS
1. Top wing is optional.
2. Top Wing must be ASCS legal. (5x5/25 sq. ft. max center) (Up to 1” wicker bill okay.)
3. Top wing to have a 30” max side board.
4. Wing sliders are allowed.
5. Nose wing is optional, and must not exceed 6 square feet.
|
|
|
Wings
Jun 29, 2014 20:40:57 GMT
Post by Admin on Jun 29, 2014 20:40:57 GMT
From Skippers Board > What are your thoughts on running WINGED spec sprints class? Drop the starters and batteries, lower the weight by 50-75 lbs. would that open the class up more and get more drivers back? You can see when a wingless spec sprint runs against the winged economy class. The two classes are clearly not on the same engine level, but maybe running the spec class with a wing would make it more of an entry level class for the 360's and 410? Just a thought. What say you?
From who ever is WSP Posts: 1 Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:22 pm
Reply to it.
It will not fly because of the cost of the wings and the motors don't have a lot of HP with the 2 brl. Carb. The other thing is the cars require more driver input then winged cars. The fans in the stands can see the drivers a lot better and see what they are really doing in the car. There are a lot of other reasons as well.
Keith
|
|
|
Wings
Jul 9, 2014 15:43:55 GMT
Post by Admin on Jul 9, 2014 15:43:55 GMT
More info from WSP What are your thoughts on running WINGED spec sprints class? Drop the starters and batteries, lower the weight by 50-75 lbs. would that open the class up more and get more drivers back? You can see when a wingless spec sprint runs against the winged economy class. The two classes are clearly not on the same engine level, but maybe running the spec class with a wing would make it more of an entry level class for the 360's and 410? Just a thought. What say you? What you are proposing is a totally new class. You need to read > specsprint.com/News.html Scroll down to the Spec Sprint Explosion. Most all of the spec sprints can't get under 1700 lbs. if they have two battery's on board. So with no battery's and no starter the cars could weigh about 110 lbs less. Now you add a wing and the cost just went up. The whole idea for this class was to keep it low cost for a sprint car. I believe it has done that to a point. The engines are getting way to costly and adding a wing just makes the cost that much worse. Not only does the wing add cost, but now you have put the engines under more load which will make rebuilds more frequent and end up costing even more. So if anyone really wants to put a wing on these and take the battery's and starter off, good luck with that. When the economy took a dump a few years ago it hit this class hard. It has not fully recovered yet and you want to make it more expensive. Not a good idea in my opinion. And yes I do put my name on post so people know wrote this. Keith
|
|
|
Wings
Jul 9, 2014 16:09:19 GMT
Post by Ned Spath on Jul 9, 2014 16:09:19 GMT
Best thing that could happen is to eliminate the starters and batteries. Leave the wings on the cars that currently run them and basically run what you got. Only rule is it has to be 360 ci. You want to run a four barrel then run it. You want to inject it, then inject it. I'll tell you right now that a well built cast iron 360 on a four barrel runs really good. Keep it a non-wing class.
|
|
|
Wings
Jul 9, 2014 20:24:03 GMT
Post by Admin on Jul 9, 2014 20:24:03 GMT
Ned,
It amazes me how many people are against the battery's and starters. Regardless of that if this was opened to injected or 4 barrel then the cost of the motors goes up. Now instead of turning 7600 the engines will now be turning well over 8000. The reason this class had done so well is by keeping the cost somewhat in check.
Keith
|
|
|
Wings
Aug 15, 2014 0:39:28 GMT
Post by Admin on Aug 15, 2014 0:39:28 GMT
Sprint cars fall into two categories: winged and non-winged. The driving dynamics are markedly different. "A non-wing car is a lot harder to drive because you don't have down force," explains four-time champion and racing instructor Wally Pankratz. "With a wing, you can just flat-foot it around the track.
|
|
|
Wings
Jan 13, 2015 7:08:15 GMT
Post by C.W. on Jan 13, 2015 7:08:15 GMT
Just happened to be browsing message boards and a link to this thread popped up. It's nice to see Keith and Debbie still sticking up for this division and the little guy in racing. That is one of the key reasons I have been an advocate for this type of racing for as long as I have been. It was created with the budget racer in mind. It's fine the way it is. Back when we put this thing together, wings were researched and we had a veteran driver doing the winged racing. I believe 4 barrels were tested as well. There were issues, and wingless was decided to be the best route to go. It really is the best. Now, I heard all kinds of nonsense when we put this deal together. Wings was one thing. Another, who really should know better, was talking about push starts and other things. No. There's a reason we went self starting. We don't want to be a drag on the program. No less than 12 cars per race that first year. A high of 17 and 31 total. There aren't many classes that start in their first year with those numbers. Even Dirt Mods only had 4 cars opening night at Antioch their first season. Seems like we had the right set of rules to me. B Mains the next year. Blowout race the year after with 32 cars at Chowchilla. A couple years after that, Chico had over 70 for a special race. By then, everybody wanted it. I'm still blown away by the fact that Orland was the first track to follow Antioch. They'll have them again in 2015 under the new management. But Petaluma, Watsonville, Chico, Marysville... The class exploded. The problem now is a bad economy and people making decisions to cut back or stop racing. But this class is still good for at least 12 cars at most tracks. Why? The rules. They make things affordable and competitive. Now, if you want your wings. Go to Chico. I hated the idea. I still do. Why? They have Spec Sprints. These classes are similar enough that I knew they would split the car count. Guess what? They did. Now, if there is this great demand for Winged Spec Sprints, Chico would be exploding in that class. They aren't. It's not the first track to do a winged class. Merced had it for over a decade. Never quite turned into anything either. It had its moments, but never put any car counts into the 20's. We have too many divisions at these tracks as it is. That's part of the problem, but it leads off into another subject. We have Wingless Spec Sprints, and that is where the support needs to be. You can go to Petaluma, Marysville, Antioch, Watsonville, Orland, Chico, Hunt Series. Why mess that up? If wings are your thing, support Chico. If it's proven that there really is a demand for it, car count will grow and other tracks will follow. What is NOT needed is Winged Spec Sprints at tracks that have wingless. Dividing car counts will only hurt the show that's already there. Of course, that's my own opinion. Others may disagree... Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this post are those of an old racing reporter, column writer, announcer and co-founder of Wingless Spec Sprints and are not meant to offend. Unfortunately, these opinions sometimes do just that. Sorry about that. You know what they say about opinions
|
|
|
Wings
Jan 17, 2015 21:06:26 GMT
Post by jack41 on Jan 17, 2015 21:06:26 GMT
I agree with c.w. I have been in this class since 2004, and I love it. Im on a pretty tight budget and I can participate and have a good time. If wing cars or injected cars were all that was available I really dont think I could do it. Im sure there are quite a few limited budget racers like me out there. Do not change anything. Ive been around quite a while and every time you change things it costs everybody more money. Its working leave it alone.
|
|
|
Wings
Jan 22, 2015 22:56:35 GMT
Post by C.W. on Jan 22, 2015 22:56:35 GMT
I'm not sure what this means, so I'm biting my tongue for now. Antioch Speedway has "dropped" Wingless Spec Sprints from the 2015 schedule and introduced Econo 360 Sprints. It may not mean changes this year, but one has to wonder about the future. Rules for this class are forthcoming and will be available on the track's official site. I know Econo Sprints at Chico are a winged class. I'll bite my tongue in case I am reading more into this. I will say I am very proud of this division and all it has accomplished. It could have been even bigger if certain powers that be had wanted that. Regardless, the point was proven. Many good races at several tracks have been run by Spec Sprints during the past 16 seasons. It's not done yet, so there is more to come. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this post are those of an old racing reporter, column writer, announcer and co-founder of Wingless Spec Sprints and are not meant to offend. Unfortunately, these opinions sometimes do just that. Sorry about that. You know what they say about opinions
|
|
|
Wings
Oct 11, 2019 14:08:11 GMT
Post by Ellneinee on Oct 11, 2019 14:08:11 GMT
Priligy Lugares <a href=http://buyonlinecial.com>cheap cialis online</a> Can Priligy Be Taken With Cialis
|
|
|
Wings
Mar 18, 2020 14:17:38 GMT
Post by idtumfrumb on Mar 18, 2020 14:17:38 GMT
viagra generic viagra online <a href="http://extrim-class.ru/ #">generic viagra </a> cheap viagra generic viagra ufiouas0209sss viagra online cheap viagra <a href=http://c-vacant.ru>buy viagra </a> viagra online buy viagra
|
|
|
Wings
Nov 12, 2021 19:48:51 GMT
Post by cialis support 365 on Nov 12, 2021 19:48:51 GMT
<a href="https://cialiswithdapoxetine.com/#">cialis support 365</a> cialis coupon
|
|
cialis tadalafil & dapoxetine
Guest
|
Wings
Nov 16, 2021 7:54:26 GMT
Post by cialis tadalafil & dapoxetine on Nov 16, 2021 7:54:26 GMT
|
|
cialis tadalafil & dapoxetine
Guest
|
Wings
Nov 16, 2021 7:58:01 GMT
Post by cialis tadalafil & dapoxetine on Nov 16, 2021 7:58:01 GMT
|
|
|
Wings
Nov 19, 2021 21:01:04 GMT
Post by cialis 20 mg on Nov 19, 2021 21:01:04 GMT
cialis 20 mg <a href="https://cialiswithdapoxetine.com/#">cialis tablets</a>
|
|